Boston Lawyer Blog

Attorney Quinn-Judge Wins Appeal of Criminal Conviction

Published on: December 5, 2025 | by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP

The Appeals Court vacated the convictions of our firm’s client, concluding that the Commonwealth “presented evidence that repeatedly violated the first complaint rule” that came from “no fewer than five witnesses and a written exhibit,” and to which the prosecutor specifically directed the jury’s attention during her closing argument. Specifically, the Commonwealth elicited impermissible testimony from multiple witnesses, introduced medical records that included impermissible commentary, and repeatedly presented evidence about the fact of the defendant’s arrest and the police investigation as a whole. The Appeals Court concluded that the “prejudicial effect of the repeated complaints was strong enough to have materially influenced the jury’s ultimate verdicts” and vacated the defendants’ convictions.

Zalkind Law Files Amicus Brief in Transgender Athlete Cases at Supreme Court

Published on: November 18, 2025 | by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP

Zalkind Law, along with Public Counsel and Hutchinson Black and Cook, filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of transgender female athletes challenging their states’ bans on transgender girls’ participation in girls’ athletics. The cases are West Virgina v. BPJ and Little v. Hecox. The brief, written on behalf of sixteen women’s and girls’ advocacy groups, illustrates how transgender sports bans harm all women and girls who want to participate in sports. By imposing invasive sex verification procedures on girls’ sports teams (but not boys’ teams), these laws subject girls to unnecessary and expensive medical procedures to prove they are entitled to participate in sports. These laws feed into a long history of excluding women from sports, target any girls whose bodies or talents deviate from stereotypes of femininity or girlhood, and serve as a tool for harassment and abuse of female athletes. Zalkind Law is proud to contribute our work towards the effort to achieve the dream of Title IX: one where all girls and women have access to athletic programs where they can achieve their full potential.

The brief is available here.

Attorneys Naomi Shatz, Inga Bernstein, and Tess Halpern drafted this brief on behalf of Zalkind Law.

Ten Zalkind Law Attorneys Named in 2026 Edition of Best Lawyers in America

Published on: August 21, 2025 | by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP

Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP is proud to announce that all eight of the firm’s attorneys, and two of the firm’s of-counsel attorneys, were named in the 2026 edition of Best Lawyers in America.

In addition, Inga Bernstein was named “Lawyer of the Year” for Employment Law – Individuals, and David Duncan was named “Lawyer of the Year” for Appellate Practice.

Best Lawyers is the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession and rates attorneys by conducting exhaustive peer-review surveys in which tens of thousands of leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers. Congratulations to all!

Attorney Quinn-Judge Wins Appeals of Criminal Conviction

Published on: May 28, 2025 | by Emma Quinn-Judge

Attorney Emma Quinn-Judge won an appeal of an assault and battery conviction in the Appeals Court. In Commonwealth v. Jeudin, the firm’s client was charged with strangulation. After the Commonwealth rested its case, Mr. Jeudin moved for–and the judge granted–a required finding of not guilty because the Commonwealth had not proved the elements of strangulation. The judge then reduced the charge to assault and battery, and the jury convicted the client of that charge.

On appeal, Attorney Quinn-Judge argued that reducing the charge to assault and battery was improper because it allowed the jury to convict Mr. Jeudin for conduct that he was not charged with in the complaint, that assault and battery has at least one element strangulation does not have, and that Mr. Jeudin was further prejudiced by this change in charge because it impacted the strategic decisions he had made with respect to his trial. The Appeals Court agreed, finding that the amendment of the charge let the jury convict the client for a crime that was not alleged in the complaint against him, based on different actions than those alleged in the complaint. The Appeals Court further found that this error prejudiced Mr. Jeudin, and reversed the judgment against him.

Boston Bar Journal Article by Zalkind Law attorneys David Russcol and Niamh Gibbons Provides Guidance on Criminal Record Sealing in Massachusetts

Published on: May 27, 2025 | by David Russcol and Niamh Gibbons

The process for sealing a criminal record in Massachusetts has changed significantly in recent years due to amendments to the sealing statute and new court decisions. Zalkind Law attorneys David Russcol and Niamh Gibbons explain the current state of the law and provide practical tips for attorneys helping clients navigate the process, including those seeking to file in court to seal records of dismissed or nol prossed charge before they are eligible to be sealed through the more straightforward administrative process.

Sealing State Criminal Records: A Practitioner’s Guide

Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein Joins Amicus in Support of Perkins Coie and the Rule of Law

Published on: April 4, 2025 | by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP

Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP is proud to join more than 500 other law firms in an amicus brief supporting Perkins Coie’s challenge to the Trump Administration’s executive order targeting that firm. As a firm dedicated to representing individuals who stand up to the government and large institutions, Zalkind Law applauds Perkins Coie for resisting the administration’s attempts to bully and threaten law firms into abandoning the core values of the American justice system.

Read the full brief here

View the list of law firms here

Ana Muñoz selected for Women’s Leadership Institute

Published on: January 21, 2025 | by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP

The Women’s Bar Association of Massachusetts has selected Ana Muñoz to participate in the 2024-2025 Women’s Leadership Initiative, a program that provides mentoring and leadership development for women attorneys in Massachusetts who have been identified as the rising stars of the profession. WBA President Alexandra Mitropoulos said, “The WBA is so pleased that Ana Muñoz will join as a member of the new class of the WBA’s Mary K. Ryan Women’s Leadership Initiative. The program is directly aligned with the WBA’s goal of advancing women in the profession and we are certain that Ana will be a beacon for that important work. We are thrilled to have such a promising class, led by accomplished mentors committed to developing the next generation of women leaders.” Congratulations to Ana and all the other women leaders selected for this honor.

Ana Muñoz becomes Zalkind Law’s newest partner

Published on: December 28, 2024 | by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP

Ana-Isabel

Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP is proud to announce that Ana Muñoz joins the firm’s partnership effective January 1, 2025. Ana will continue her litigation practice in employment, complex civil litigation, civil rights, and criminal matters. For more information about Ana’s background and experience, find her biography here.

Commonwealth Adopts Position Advocated by Attorney Herrmann in Criminal Case Before SJC

Published on: December 6, 2024 | by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP

This week at the SJC, the Commonwealth adopted the position of an amicus brief for the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (MACDL), authored by Jennifer Herrmann. The case, Commonwealth v. Andrade, addressed the question of whether evidence of a victim’s violent acts used to prove who was the first aggressor—known in Massachusetts as Adjutant evidence—should include evidence of a victim’s violence after the charged crime.

“I will concede that the amicus brief filed in this case lays out a lot of really great policy arguments for extending the Adjutant principle to post-crime conduct,” ADA Kristen Jiang stated at argument. “The Commonwealth does not contest that.”

Both parties and the justices repeatedly referenced Attorney Herrmann’s amicus brief, which argued that extending Adjutant evidence to subsequent conduct is consistent with Massachusetts law and general principles of evidence. ADA Jiang also said, “The amicus brief was very helpful to me in thinking through the reasoning that other jurisdictions have gone through in deciding this issue . . . . I was able to think of lots of scenarios in my head where a post-crime violent act would be extremely probative of whether the victim was the first aggressor. The cases that are cited by the amicus brief are rife with examples of that, so to say that it’s an absolute bar for that reason I’m not sure is correct.”

Zalkind Law attorneys selected for Boston magazine’s Top Lawyers 2024

Published on: November 25, 2024 | by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP

Congratulations to Inga Bernstein, selected for Boston magazine’s Top Lawyers™ 2024 – Criminal Defense/White Collar, and Monica Shah, selected for Boston magazine’s Top Lawyers™ 2024 – Labor and Employment. The full list of 2024 Top Lawyers can be viewed here.